Your source for local news, sports, high school sports and weather in and around Jefferson City, Columbia, Fulton and the Lake of the Ozarks. This document may not be reprinted without power of public opinion essay express written permission of News Tribune Publishing. Please forward this error screen to 208. He was not interested in publishing negative book reviews.
Fitzgerald said, he desired to promote a positive community experience. In place of “the scathing takedown rip,” Fitzgerald said, he desired to promote a positive community experience. A community, even one dedicated to positivity, needs an enemy to define itself against. The site is one of the leading voices of the moment, thriving in the online sharing economy, in which agreeability is popularity, and popularity is value.
Upworthy, the next iteration, has gone ahead and made its name out of the premise. There is more at work here than mere good feelings. There is a consensus, or something that has assumed the tone of a consensus, that we are living, to our disadvantage, in an age of snark—that the problem of our times is a thing called “snark. The word, as used now, is a fairly recent addition to the language, and it is not always entirely clear what “snark” may be. In her essay, Julavits was grappling with the question of negative book reviewing: Was it fair or necessary? Was the meanness displayed in book reviews a symptom of deeper failings in the culture?
I bought the Denby book used for six bucks, to cut him out of the loop on any royalties. But why are nastiness and snideness taken to be features of our age? One general point of agreement, in denunciations of snark, is that snark is reactive. It is a kind of response. Yet to what is it responding? Of what is it contemptuous?